Project 1: How do arguments work?

In project 1 of ENC 1102, students learn the basics of formal argument by observing how rhetors (anyone who purposefully communicates to a specific audience) persuade their audience.  Students will read texts, watch videos, or listen to audio of rhetors making social, political, or academic arguments.  They will then dissect these arguments, explaining the strengths and weaknesses of the rhetors' techniques.

In this image, the rhetor is using pathos, logos, and ethos to communicate an argument to an audience.  The student is looking on, considering how he or she might purposefully use similar rhetorical techniques in different contexts. 

 

Project 2: How do I use rhetoric to resolve differences?

Project 2 challenges students to explore, analyze, and engage arguments based on Rogerian argumentation.  Students enhance their knowledge of the conventions of academic discourse by developing an annotated bibliography and integrating research into their argument. 

In this image, the student writer is negotiating an understanding between different points of view, which is the hallmark of Rogerian argument.

 

Project 3: How do arguments become action?

In project 3, students use what they've learned about how arguments function (project 1) and the ethical components of arguments (project 2) to research and enact social change.

Students compose texts that show a researched, complex understanding of a social injustice or environmental problem.  These texts are designed to inspire others to change the students' chosen injustices.  Many students will also design creative ways to address these injustices as part of their projects